Showing posts with label war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war. Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 April 2009

Lion for lambs by Redford versus Half Nelson by Ryan Fleck


For a week now I've been picking dvds at the video club next door, this is one of the advantages of being sedentary! I have an address which is mine!
Most of the time I consider that a visit to the video club is supposed to lead to an obscure and potentially cult movie, but this club is not old enough, and I've heard or seen most of the stuff they've got so my choice has to be on dealing with lost time and movies I wanted but couldn't see. When that we'll be done, I'll try the dubious ones but my mood and my soul need to be fed now, so I stay in the drama/ intelligent session at the moment.
So last week I saw Southland tales, and I'll definitely talk about it, so stay connected, but what I am intrigued by , right now, is the choice I made yesterday of two very different things expressing similar thesis:
Lions for Lambs by Robert Redford
And
Half nelson by… Ryan Fleck

Dialectics
Lions for Lambs

Lions for lambs is made of three stories related which each others, two of dialogues, and one of action. A journalist is interviewing a senator who wants to promote a new tactic to win the war in Afghanistan, a political science teacher is trying to get a bright student back to class, telling the story of two other students, very promising ones who enrolled in the army, the action part is the story of the intervention in Afghanistan and what is happening to those two promising student professor redford is using in his demonstration.
Of the three the most important part is the one of the dialogue between the teacher and the student. A talented student doesn't want to commit in politics because the game is already played, does this experience comes from life? No only from considerations, and lack of belief that if you pay attention to things the world can change. What is the biggest problem in politics? no one gets involved besides those in love with power, the "failing" of a generation, thour parent's one the sixties, the fact that they became ordinary citizen and that all in all nothing changed, made us just interested in saving our own asses!
The whole film is dialectics, confrontation between two generations 68 and 2008, trying to convince someone to beleive in what another beleive. Most of the "protests" films are, or were about teaching things to ignorant people: what happened etc? The whole goal of Spielberg when he made the Schindler list was to show what shoah has been to Americans but for those who know…
lions for lambs is different, it doesn't say here's what's right, here what's wrong, the whole point, is get involved in what's going on, because politics are not something outside of your life , politics are what's you are making of your life.
On a human scale it also shows how individuals are sacrificed on a day to day basis and how it is easy to get spoiled!
I love the fact that old Robert Redford still whispering in human ears is trying still to wake people up.
This ante universal crisis film seems to predict what is now getting real in our streets! take care of politics if not politics will take care of you!

Half Nelson

Dan Dunn is a history teacher in a ghetto medium school, he's teaching history and tries to write a children book about dialectics. History is made of changes, of confronting forces, and through this motto he's teaching 8th grade children about the big fight for rights of the twentieth century.
But our guy, though extremely talented is fucked up, the feeling of failing leads him to drug use, and abuse, he can't deal with the realities of everyday life, and destroys everything around besides the kids that he's sincerely trying to help.
Drey whose older brother has been imprisoned for dealing drugs discovers her teacher's addiction.
Both teacher and pupil will go on their path to destruction, like two forces fighting and helping each other, the whole film is rythmed by the exposé of kid with document film on the civil rights fights, south africa… The actors are amazing, little Drey react like a kid, and the paradigm of the brilliant but fucked up teacher, demonstrates fantastically how tough it is to be a human being in a fucked up world.
This film is brilliant, not only because the intrigue is, but also because it's filmed like a documentary sometimes, the lighting is beautiful and the story and the levels of interpretations are multiple.
I have to say that it's not depressing; there is such a good energy in it, that you are boosted by this film though it depicts tough events.
Half Nelson is a wrestling pass, isn't it? So teaching is wrestling, life is wrestling! As Redford said in Lions for Lambs: "The decisions you make now bud, can't be changed or with years and years of hard work to redo it, in those years you become something different everybody does, time passes, you get married, you get in debt but you're never gonna be the same person you are now and promises and potential, it's very frail and it just might not be there anymore!"
Strangely Dan is trying to do the same thing that Redford :helping the talented one to change the world but he got lost on his way. In both films there are similarities of dialogues, and I am amazed by the luck that made me chose them both on the same day!!

Thursday, 30 October 2008

Tropic Thunder / Tonnerre sous les tropiques by/de Ben Stiller


English
After Derek Zoolander, the model who does the mine, Ben Stiller presents the actors who go to war. For both films the problematic seems to be the same: How to connect beings detached from reality to reality?
Well you can’t! Lol
This film has many levels of humour.
First: violence, the basic humour that makes the character being bullied by the spectator, like the king of carnival he needs to be burnt and tortured for the sake of society, and his pain is hilarious. Thus Tugg Speeder is kicked in the ass, forced to play forever the part of Jack the retarded. He’s tortured (and it’s hilarious to hear him shout « cut » each time his head gets out of the water)…
There’s verbal humour, I’ve never heard so much swearing in a film, it’s regressive and pushed to the maximum.
There’s obsession: with the monomaniac characters like Robert Downey junior who turned black to be in this movie and always stays in the part (until the comments of the DVD are made) and Jack Black who’s only goal in this film is to get to the mountain of heroin!
Then completely original: the acting humour: « you never go full retard… Dustin Hoffman played a retard but he had skills he could count, you, you went total retard, no one goes total retard » or ‘ "I am the dude who plays the black dude who’s…» I love the fact that Ben Stiller want to stay in his jail because he plays 4 times a day with a fascinated audience!
Then last but not least the parody of war films, and films on films.
Am I the dude, who plays parts, or am I the dude who writes this damn blog, or am I the dude who lives … which dude am I?
I loved it so much that if I could I would have seen it once more just after the end of the credits where Tom Cruise unrecognisable danceship hop!
Français
Après les mannequins à la mine, voici les acteurs à la guerre, ou comment confronter des êtres détachés de toute réalité à la réalité ? Voici la question métaphysique qui taraude ce film hilarant. Tonnerre sous les Tropiques fonctionne sur plusieurs niveaux d’humour.
Il y a d’abord la violence, l’humour basique qui fait de l’acteur le souffre douleur du spectateur plus ou moins sadique. Comme le roi de carnaval, il doit être brûlé, ou mis au pilori histoire de défouler le peuple. Ainsi Tugg Speeder se prend des coups de pied au cul, est torturé, utilisé comme objet de rançon, forcé à jouer indéfiniment le rôle qui a mis sa carrière sur le déclin…
Il y a l’humour verbale qui est d’une vulgarité jamais entendue au cinéma, totalement régressive et jouissive aucune limite n’est mise ni au vocabulaire ni aux images.
Il y a l’obsession et la monomanie, le ridicule des personnages que ce soit l’acteur qui change de couleur de peau pour jouer un rôle ou celui dont le seul but devient de sniffer une montagne d’héroïne.
Ensuite originalité totale, l’humour d’acteur : où commence l’acteur ou s’arrête le personnage ? comment choisir ses rôles? le côté force obscure de ses talents étranges qu’ils ont finis par récolter au cours des tournages… Puis le désir de rester dans une prison pour jouer 4 représentations par jour devant un public acquis.
Enfin il y a la parodie du film de guerre et la parodie des films sur les films…
Et tous ces humours ne sont pas alignés mais entassés les uns sur les autres ce qui fait qu’une fois de plus Ben Stiller ne nous laisse pas le temps de respirer entre deux éclats de rire !! Déjà culte !
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...